Is the maxim advised to the Oregon Supreme Courts mandamus order pre-discretionary to disposition concerning a judicial body's bias and awe inspiring to an unapprised public minds conception of the art portrayed in the gift canon Jonah?

Questions presented Q)1. Is the maxim advised to the Oregon Supreme Courts mandamus order pre-discretionary to disposition concerning a judicial body’s bias and awe inspiring to an unapprised public minds conception of the art portrayed in the gift canon Jonah? Q) 2. Truth or destruction? ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS AND RELATED CASES 1. Pro se, AUSTIN CALLAHAN BRAND-8809 SE 190" Dr., Damascus, Oregon 97089. PETITIONER, member of; Voice of the Trumpet, International Ministries-19715 SE Anderson Rd., Damascus, OR 97089 2. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM #753239 Attorney General, BENJAMIN GUTMAN #160599 Solicitor General 400 Justice Building 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301 RESPONDENT(S); Gresham City Police Department, et al., 1333 NW Eastman Pkwy. Gresham, Oregon 97030., Charles Skeahan#41834 (affiant), Aaron Turnage#51413 (witness on new trial). 3. Multnomah County Judge Eric. J Bergstrom1021 SW fourth ave., OR Portland 97204. * STATE OF OREGON V. AUSTIN CALLAHAN BRAND, 301 Or App. 59, A162224 (Dec. 4, 2019), review denied, 366 Or. 259, #S067354(Mar. 26, 2020) iii II. _—‘