No. 21-6084
Jacquelyne Jones v. Nicole Jobe
IFP
Tags: canon-of-judicial-ethics civil-rights court-procedure due-process ex-parte ex-parte-proceeding judicial-canon judicial-conduct judicial-ethics procedural-rules state-courts supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Kansas Supreme Court fail to follow the law and rules of the judiciary in condoning a procedure of one of its state courts in violation of Kansas Canon 2,9(a) which prohibited judges from initiating ex parte proceedings in an impending matter?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED DID THE KANSAS SUPREME COURT IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES | SUPREME COURT PRESENDENT FAILED TO FOLLOW THE LAW AND RULES | OF THE JUDICIARY IN CONDONING A PROCEDURE OF ONE OF IT’S STATE COURT IN VIOLATION OF KANSAS CANNON 2,9(A) WHICH PROHIBITED JUDGES FROM INITIATING EX PARTE PROCEEDING IN AN IMPENDING | MATTER. | . | | | |
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)