Robert George Knecht, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Whether the State Court of Appeals erred and departed from the essential requirements of the law and federal constitutional claims
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED | ' -— Diatniet Oo Whether the Shite Coue-+ of APfenls erred And de Parked | $Seom the essenhal Reduiements of he laud ancl fer Cugiann Affwmed Pehhoners Fedeont Consthehonal Clam. ———Pabthenee. has been illegally terested and Restraint Whee the Heed Count Lrekecd Ertisdichon to enfeecria The Rroeeudeels 7 : Crise. due +o The Witeant had -ASt been Mle wih the Geek OF The Court to ISeued anv Peres Whitint fou fofthiner’s — Ahest And the feebable. Cruse. Adair was Insucient 40 io | SUpRoRe A Felony Change Aphinst Bkitonen And Ht Cecates & Manifest OP inSushee, and Violates fefitionels Mahts Agninet tue US. — longt oS and 1 Amendment. And Fa, Cnet: Ritiole. ty Sechion A, And 12; Due faces, of Lande U : : |