No. 21-6088

George Brass v. Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of Nevada, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims criminal-procedure due-process free-speech habeas-corpus judicial-review procedural-default standing state-court takings
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether reasonable jurists would find the rulings as to the issues related to the withdrawal of claims and related issues debatable of wrong

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, Wheller ceadomuble GucisdS would Cid the rolisep as te the fsses tela fo Me cevdwes debtulle of wrong, 2, Whether reasandde jurists woud Cad the poling 6 as to the Systema (C e¥closion af AR cena Amercoms From Hhe vente debadile ot wrong | | 3, whether ceusonulle jurists would Giad The rdisy ag to the withdrawa oF clea owd reluded 1ssuey debchigle of wtery . «oa wchehous 4 ighether reusomabsle yutiots world Gob dhe Vly ao the jury | : MS ‘im Bewss5 Cus? 6S well ag fhe ¢feck & Ramada v¥ Lancia debatble Wow:

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

George Brass
George Brass — Petitioner