1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals can refuse to consider and rule upon a duly filed Motion to Recall Mandate, the basis of said motion alleges that the Eleventh Circuit, in denying a Certificate of Appealability (COA), based that COA denial upon a merits determination of facts supporting the constitutional claim presented, a decision and judgment made without jurisdiction and in direct violation of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)?

2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision and judgment to deny a COA on the constitutional claim presented based on a merits determination of the underlying facts supporting that claim, a decision and judgment made without jurisdiction, and in direct violation of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1), are, as a matter of law, absolutely void?

3. Whether a pro se prisoner litigant has a procedural due process right, pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rule 41-1(b), which authorizes the Eleventh Circuit to recall a mandate already issued to a file a request the mandate be recalled, a request alleging the Eleventh Circuit acted without jurisdiction in its decision and judgment denying a COA, because that decision and judgment was a merits based decision, in direct violation of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals can refuse to consider and rule upon a duly filed Motion to Recall Mandate