No. 21-6103

Moses D. Estrada v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-10-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attorney-client-relationship collaborative-discovery constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-procedure legal-interpretation procedural-rights right-to-counsel victim-rights
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an accused have a right to effective assistance of counsel when the accused does not collaborate with counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : de dad. bis/hec rights fe be few |. Does any aceussed HY ) hen appellents ferme yal court and/or apres tes the np \n ” iM ~ dees not ac) ue cate noc ers! decisiers ? , counse | ete fegte and [oe Afratos'& developing “ cme ~ “ted by thelr ohtrents Alene . victe . 7 , ‘7 . an accused be o does pot co|lobocate lion . ; 2-0 f ae S103 victim , when . Crime. ; +t : aicar eh be taken so tha . “Weade Brief -} ike a bee ae sues thot co uvse | : an Meese beret or mwestigare 1M gee . de ¢ not ; oy) thee nprenlare yesves | . 6 ; oun + gu oct of pot support ond 4 othe High couch @ ce? iyctecrejatie in . Doe | under gos o “ two-ster me exist? . . acculcse aicand ized w hen We emer Cxy bat hg pot

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Moses D. Estrada
Moses D. Estrada — Petitioner
Moses D. Estrada — Petitioner