No. 21-6108

Paradise L. v. Arizona Department of Child Safety, et al.

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2021-10-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-general clear-and-convincing-evidence constitutional-rights due-process evidence-standard fourteenth-amendment parental-rights termination-of-rights witness-exclusion
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the termination of mother's parental rights was supported by clear and convincing evidence as required by the due process clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether The State Of Arizona Failed To Terminate Mother’s Parental Rights By At Least Clear & Convincing Evidence As Required By The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment? 2. Whether The Termination Of Mother’s Parental Rights Was Erroneously Predicated Solely Upon The Children’s Best Interests In Violation Of The Due Process Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment? 3. Whether Statements By The Attorney General And Exclusion Of Mother’s Witness Constituted A Violation Of Mother’s Constitutional Right To Due Process? 1

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona Department of Child Safety to respond filed.
2021-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Arizona Department of Child Safety
Drew Curtis EnsignOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Drew Curtis EnsignOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Paradise L
Florence M. Bruemmer — Petitioner
Florence M. Bruemmer — Petitioner