Whether a Pattern and/or Practice of Discrimination took place

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a Pattern and/or Practice of Discrimination took place in Charleston S.C. District Court, depriving Pro Se Petitioner of Constitutional Rights? , 2. Whether retaliation (including obstructing the court’s investigation) against a (OSHA) Whistleblower is protected by immunity under the Eleventh Amendment states protection ; . with a waiver of Sovereign Immunity? 3. Whether fraudulent acts on the court with civil conspiracy still protected with Qualified or Absolute Immunity with a waiver of . Sovereign Immunity? 4. Whether “Equal Protection” is provided on Pro Se litigation with inappropriate standard for review (28 U.S.C. § 1915) is systematic ; . misconduct using frivolous in pro se paid litigation still entitles Charleston District Court employees outside their jurisdiction to Qualified and or Absolute Immunity? 5. Whether multiple intentional violations of “Due Process” Statute notification by the court with intent to dismiss immune from suit? 6. Whether Inherited Power or authority, is immune from FTCA’s, that show deprivation of constitutional rights with fraudulent (breach of duty) under the Color of Law in governmental office actionable? 7. Whether Equal Protection was provided by the Executive Branch to prevent racial bias / retaliation against Pro Se Petitioner whom | filed Judicial Complaints against court ' officials? 8. Whether attorneys willfully and deliberately lying to this Supreme Court in Case 10-115 (2010) on “lost time” accident OSHA report or bankruptcy automatic stay invoked 26 U.S.C. ; § 7206(1) or “Fraud on the Court” denies qualified immunity? 9. Whether the Charleston District Court (management /USA-DOJ Agents) committed “Obstruction of Justice”; violating their oath of public office with amending the dismissal of an ADA and Counterclaim intentionally depriving timely rights to appeal Fed R App P. 4(a)(1)(A) un-constitutional? 10. Whether Charleston District Court’s racial bias causing fraud on the court and denial of Title VII “ADA” Failure to accommodate claim immune from lawsuits? 11. Whether negligence and, or intentional abuse of authority with a deputy clerk Amending Summary Judgment 28 U.S.C. § 955 without an Order violates Pro Se constitutional rights cause for action with waiver Sovereign Immunity under FTCA? : 12. Whether a district court issuing an Amended Summary Judgement after closing a case, reducing the number of Title VII claims dismissed, without sending notification to Pro Se litigant, is still a final judgment for appeal with two claims never closed actionable? 13. Whether proceedings pending before the Charleston District Court with a Chapter 11 stay ‘ allows proceeding with ADA claims to have ii summary judgment amended during the stay changing the date a case is ripe for a timely appeal before a lift order is issued legal? 14. Whether appealing from a SDNY Bankruptcy. Court with an Order lifting the stay to a Charleston District Court for reconsideration of a disputed material fact with the Magistrates R&R ; allows 30 days to appeal under 11 U.S.C:§ 108(c) for continuing a civil action? iii .