Was Petitioner Racially Discriminated because he is Black?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Pop OnE 2D21-379 D. Petitioner AUnited statis cil-zan AFT Mielec INET URS Grd Fath Amanduad Pred On ECod 7 ie Demis _ Malenay AT Tha. Siyprassion haming. Judge Maloney Fhilicl 1 APE — @ APPLY The geval ProrecTipr ; 7 Was Patthoner Racial Discommintléd bacnusti he is Black” ? ne ls net TGATGA likiz Al unl S(Ales C125, Pésidail oF Flotda? D). Die The Cont deny Felitiner Labo 5a United Stiles cili2én, Eel pratonty OF The baw Ard End proliclion oF The bay iahen The Jobe Auld b Follaw his OAT, duly Ard Catal 16 the Créfitoln inhhyng Feanth Antednend Pclin 7 , 3) felltiner isa Black mn And uns Arnel by Allin Shari, ProSEO by All while Plostcror's fd jodged by Alluhile jadges. fener Jey PMe| oF 40 penal wing AU LATE, KCK Pop ong . neha To ts / Haale fed on Mino gn ThA cone ll PONS NE COMI SPEAK ENGI 5h Very well or trick , Lats toner Deena ad Me A Tilly (Nii jahced by the Jory SBMACTION PIDLESS oF puyese/3] And SySlamAlic ExClusjon oF 26M of Colr Pym jory prnel 9 | D. TiTiner Mrs napoesd Ard clammed The tale Abney Torn evap AlLEXCUfptTany BUNCE Thal CASO] EN of Tn Ove C, |O MM Sng (A (OSM dotumaB oF 2. rapa Ard buidings Evidence, backg tayo We cles Lho lke oid OPED, All documanls, Need 5101S Ano Nepodd over 1000, Trenscupls Hom ef APPR PCE, And AM mild | QUESTIONS PESEEd AlEXAibT Ts Thisa Doe frocess vielktin oF the ith ad Fea teenth mendrent 9 2) Ae feittiner be charged Far Wiese ecants pr) Nepol IF hi. or hs poble debra néuen (eeu Wem ? 2. On the Lats hmisal order Cebbep 7, 2000, Thi, Carl Alege Brhdly vary bad, Kyles Via TBy And sMckle V. Grane gees rol APY Wb Ts Apeey _ Does Thitee Cre laws APY io ie 10% Cueul Stila ATonéy OFFICR Aine 9 DD Tha Sale ATtomey Failed b disclose ivonnnlin Ad WO oF Cesliad Buin THAT tons TEMP ied b in Coal Wied bang Soba info Enagnce O Wiihest hilo s, SANpIAS TEE ALITA, Ls This mlérwl or Paanbie Buidince to tia palin? Ag Bo Peliiner hag 7b PAY fot Wik (rele. °s Nhat Prk Not ben 1n over Io cheléndant 7 D.The Sle Attorney 13 Trost. oF onsttalon | Fairness Here ThE SA Say Hill An ASA TAN Basse? CF E16d Aid Agttlid G Neducé Ny Third degree elny:s 8 M/SfamnBArOrs jE ei ir Ay hin $000 To his (706 Fone Aceton, Paitener uns delienmnid tobe Indigenl by the Sh Ard Chain bo bE. NOCEAT of Ball Tha A arin, * Did This ranypollag oF Cos AsS2c1Hd with Eitinas Chin} Prosecution ASA Nigowalion Tlic nA ER barepan creck s vite ilitionats Srdad oF Pendimental Fajniss ? ( 2).Eeanst HATine Could nl AfPard th fy The YO, does Th Con 16 SEB A Cri CASE Fuel The LecAl Thy Ard Petul 225 felitionze utols 29 be. inka To him 7 ; QUESIIONS NESENIEd DLs iTA cont lela wibeonsl pA fink fb The SIAM AMfomay T1081 Gnd Acad bent Ar bull pal ional esa 7 0 1) Th fable DeFinekir bey ming idenliFied This Troublesome problan Anal cesT dagen PIA barpHOTACTICS being LA ed nape pel Te Aer Hil © tha Cali ber osacolon Tikrgnily “in eyend Fon Violations recommendation, Lid The tal ATlaney Viole Apclinble. <Ncies Pioes Neblg b the onda oA Prsicder dng hs pilpmmnce of i Progkevlen's OFicig| dilies ? 5) Did the § TAM AUBNGY USES An UT PROPEL ETN Tb ered A Lrorafn Lyuietin EET SSN Ad Vigony Er leoking vtthin /vd crim To PENNA 3 M5, Totiavel ica US, Chazy 2 Ded the, stile Alay comnt prestedlr MS Candee] Inpryeany al ading PAM IneL Thi wih elie Cried Ad pn sendey Tht Angled Féfilintts Thitl tnt Avy on impahad felling’ WATE. OP hecnéd Tia riegnny oF Thi prvetidedig | “DDid Aefitioner Fob DLE, ViohE thé. siXthfnendmen by Failing To CAVE 10 PeMMonat hE bred neewed A Conplaif nya” of ceri Inscanducl beatae Funiine TiAl bred selitietha AgasT SA BAY HIN? being iNeed ASSancE oP conse. (