No. 21-6116
Christopher David Cobb v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-violation due-process harmless-error oath-of-office public-employment standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the conflict between Mechanik and Bank of Nova Scotia invite arbitrary decisions from the lower courts
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1) Whether the conflict between Mechanik and Bank of Nova Scotia invite arbitrary decisions from the lower courts. : , 2) Whether it was a mistake of fact to concludef} that Mary Anne Gallagher's Oath of Office was lawfully destroyed when the law clearly forbids such destruction. 3) Whether the absence of an Oath of Office should be taken as “harmless error" or whether it is in fact a major Constitutional issue that fully invalidates all acts performed by an employee who fails to file an Oath with the agency of public employment. : . i
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2021-12-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Christopher D. Cobb
Christopher David Cobb — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent