No. 21-612
Isaac Wolf v. University Professional and Technical Employees, Communications Workers of America Local 9119, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: affirmative-consent civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech labor-law labor-rights public-workers standing supreme-court-precedent union-dues
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a union can trap a public worker into paying dues without the 'affirmative consent' required by Janus v. AFSCME
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1) Whether a union can trap a public worker into paying dues without the “affirmative consent” required by Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018).
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-09
Waiver of right of respondent Michael Drake to respond filed.
2021-11-09
Waiver of right of respondents University Professional & Technical Employees, et al. to respond filed.
2021-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California to respond filed.
2021-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Isaac Wolf
Brian Kirk Kelsey — Liberty Justice Center, Petitioner
Brian Kirk Kelsey — Liberty Justice Center, Petitioner
Michael Drake
Adam Wolff Hofmann — Hanson Bridgett LLP, Respondent
Adam Wolff Hofmann — Hanson Bridgett LLP, Respondent
Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California
Samuel Passchier Siegel — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Samuel Passchier Siegel — California Department of Justice, Respondent
University Professional & Technical Employees, et al.
Arthur Wei-Wei Liou — Leonard Carder, LLP, Respondent
Arthur Wei-Wei Liou — Leonard Carder, LLP, Respondent