No. 21-6125
Roberto Griego Jimenez v. Texas
IFP
Tags: corroboration credibility criminal-informant fourth-amendment law-enforcement magistrate-warrant probable-cause quid-pro-quo reliability
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court and Texas Court of Appeals err in their Fourth Amendment analysis?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the trial court and Texas Court of Appeals err in their Fourth Amendment analysis, when they found that a first-time criminal snitch informant, making a quid pro quo trade with law enforcement, was credible and reliable? 2, Applying a proper Fourth Amendment analysis, was there sufficient corroboration of the first-time criminal snitch informant’s tip to support the magistrate’s finding of probable cause? | | | | : i 2
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Roberto Jimenez
George Michael DeGeurin — Foreman,Degurin, Nugent, et al, Petitioner