No. 21-6126
Jason A. Tobey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion pretrial-hearing right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-continuance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a federal criminal defendant's retained counsel has abandoned him, does a court abuse its discretion by prohibiting the defendant from discharging retained counsel to avoid a trial continuance?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. When indisputable evidence shows a federal criminal defendant’s retained counsel has abandoned him at a key pretrial hearing and is not prepared for trial, does a court abuse its discretion and deprive the defendant of his Sixth Amendment rights when, for the sole purpose of avoiding continuance of a trial, it prohibits him from discharging retained counsel? i
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Jason Tobey
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent