No. 21-6127

In Re Howard Griffith

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process extraordinary-writ federal-rules habeas-corpus standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the procedure for seeking habeas corpus relief in the district court was properly preserved for appeal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented _tapplicotion for writ of habeas corpus iro the district court of the district in Cause was preserved to take habeas corpus ko the district court in the United States New Yorks Nevertheless, the procedure cowld _ only have been satistied + notity the respect to which the [writ] of phohibition _ ro be considered +0 be the initial order iH LTS Summary Order? May 42021) if : a iwhot will be the reflection of changes? | | ___|corrections “In re Poward Griffith vy New York JExtraordinar Writ|* after Augusta ~~" noni, ale 14 f 1) Nevertheless, precedent” thas been established to \oin the May oat Order of the District Court with the August 8,202) Order re “Howard Grittith etal vio HT 4 | i

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2021-12-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-18
Supplemental brief of petitioner filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent New York State to respond filed.
2021-10-05
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Griffith, In Re Howard
Howard Griffith — Petitioner
New York State
Bradley Wayne OastlerOnondaga County District Attorney's Office, Respondent