No. 21-6130
Brett Allan Corrigan, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review clear-error criminal-procedure drug-offense firearm sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review weapon-enhancement
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's finding that a weapon was connected to the drug offense under §2D1.1(b)(1) was clear error
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDING THAT A WEAPON WAS CONNECTED TO THE DRUG OFFENSE UNDER §2D1.1(b)(1) WAS CLEAR ERROR. United States v. Anderson, 618 F.3d 873 (8th Cir. 2010) United States v. Shields, 44 F.3d 673 (8th Cir. 1995) i
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Brett Corrigan
Dennis Evan McKelvie — McKelvie Law Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent