Has the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment required the Supreme Court to remedy it in the case where persons similarly situated to the petitioner have been granted relief?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | i) Has Lhe Ei ith” Linco pins cleo ine He Fetaners Comp regui res the Supreme. Court te remedy it nw the wtresf of Jes b; 1CL where Persons simular ly situated yas the. circeerte of Coase | have. boon grausted. 2) Does the court have the bisthorty under BS8ZCeKIYA) and He Chew 28 recevtl Macle. tes the [ications there of / to coms cher ) 5 4 ofp fo cons al l ‘Extraord.siary ano Compeling . circumstances beyaud Prose Ww Q sentence were if i hapane Today ? Particularly ys ha of the | global pandemic GKo the pebitioners health Prctors culng with Phe | housing Cond: tiaars within the BoP, | 3) Should He prowisians of the Fest Step Act be treated CS retroactive substantia| changer iN the Tour us fogt p Welsh v Wited Stet ) this Courts frokdinag pat as Leh g SubStwtie|! chase iw the. law wos per se refroachie. Soo | | |