Did Judge Katsten M. Culney violate the strictures of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) self-incrimination?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DID JUbbE kp _ | STRICTURES SEM UTNE Ure AR IREN THAT LAS MoT PART OF THE Tae ere | DID JUDGE KATSTEN mM, CULNeY UroURTE THE STRICTURES OF BLAKELY US, G/ASHINGTON, 5 YA © Ys, a9@ L004 SELF LWCREMENATEON ? ‘ DID TRIAL ATTORNEY TED R, DOE BBLER UTOLATE THE STRECTURES OF JAE LEE VS. UpTED STATES, JUNE 33, X0L/ CASE NUMBER 26-3377 PREJUDICE PRONE +15 AGGRAVATED FISSAULT UttTH A DEADLY WEAPON : AN ELEMENT OR A SENTENCING CONSEDERALIN pgp suDge KRESTEN ™: Gutvey DIRECT A > YERDECT? ND TRIAL ATTORNEY TED R, DOEBBLER ULOLATE THE STRICKLAND RULE? WHEN HE FALLEO / TO OBJECT 7O THE SENTENCE ZMPOSED UPON VANCE L, Q/HLTE | ‘ YS, S20 LZ GQ7) —RETNG A BIASED JUDGE Ms DID JUDGE GuLNEy UZOLATE THE STRICTURES OF TAYLOR Vs, HAYES, 118 US, UBB L197) JUDICIAL BIAS BY THE JULGE?