Whether Petitioner's exculpatory evidence claims reflect actual innocence of sexual assault

No question identified. : | QUEST TONS PRESENTED 3 C\nether_Manerial excuiPatoyy evidence Cains Peritioner tis in 4 LA California Prison ot the time poise allegations Were ledaed against him reflects ockuol Innecence ch Seual ascouthe 7 |) Whether Petitioners Trial tounsels awa almssien.of his otlures__ Ste exercise. due diligence. by iliue to Present excul farord evidence Hat a J weutd have exonerated him, inceeetive assisxante o& Counsel 3 ne /,) 4 1 Mhesher Tried Court and the Federal Counts Failure te loud. ouidentiary heanng.aste Peitioners octal innocence, ihe fettblenn _ 3 Possemsed the. material evidence anialation of the Canon Coles and abuse _ oF Powers, a Malation of the GD and WED vawendment Pe , 14) Whether she. stare and Tear Tudse resronsibie Coc¥monstnsyh ae 2 Providing defandant with ofybiic defender ywhom Coossinedsperethet with ne sé each other +o Keel cat Conctete evidence oc Wolataco Partione®s (440) Amend? oe do CS) Wether thetdottudads and faloral Tudses Speculatine thest'd ia 2A taken inher testimounts on alause of discpetion-and chased the tal Pereedias 2 2, : o | ee er e 4