No. 21-6176
Dwaine Collymore, aka Twin v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(8)(A) attempted-hobbs-act-robbery attempted-robbery crime-of-violence exceptional-importance federal-criminal-law hobbs-act rule-of-lenity sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery falls outside the definition of a 'crime of violence' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery, which may be completed through an attempted threat alone, see 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), falls outside the definition of a “crime of violence” in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(A). i
Docket Entries
2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-27
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Taylor</i>, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-05
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 5, 2022.
2021-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 6, 2021 to January 5, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Dwaine Collymore
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent