No. 21-618
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: codefendant-conduct codefendant-liability confrontation-clause confrontation-right criminal-procedure forfeiture-by-wrongdoing sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence witness-unavailability
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant forfeits his Sixth Amendment right to confront a witness against him when the defendant did not engage in conduct designed to prevent the witness from testifying but the wrongful act of a codefendant made the witness unavailable to testify?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a_ defendant forfeits his Sixth Amendment right to confront a witness against him when the defendant did not engage in conduct designed to prevent the witness from testifying but the wrongful act of a codefendant made the witness unavailable to testify?
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-07
Brief of respondent Mississippi in opposition filed.
2021-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2022.
2021-12-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 5, 2022 to February 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-06
Response Requested. (Due January 5, 2022)
2021-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2021-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Armand Jones
Graham Patrick Carner — Graham P. Carner, PLLC, Petitioner
Mississippi
Barbara Wakeland Byrd — Mississippi Attorney General's Office, Respondent