Did the United States District Court — Central District of California's Chief Judge Philip S. Gutierrez violate the United States Constitution when he abused the lawsuit case that the petitioner won and closed it with prejudice and without leave to amend and prevented the formally requested Jury Trial from occurring because the petitioner refused to offer him a 'Bribe' through the Assistant United States Attorney Alarice M. Medrano, to discriminate and retaliate against the petitioner because of the petitioner's protected classes and statuses and federally protected activities including but not limited to two Motions to Disqualify him, and to cover the Respondents' radically extreme and malicious hate crimes because the Respondents are Federal Agencies and the involved public officials are kings and above the law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the United States District Court — Central District of California’s Chief Judge Philip S. Gutierrez violate the United States Constitution when he abused the Jawsuit case that |] have won and closed it with prejudice and without a leave to amend and prevented the formally requested Jury Trial to occur because | refused to offer him a “Bribe” through the Assistant United States Attorney Alarice M. Medrano, to discriminate and retaliate me because of my protected classes and statuses and federally protected activities including but not limited to two Motions to Disqualify him, and to cover Respondents radically extreme and malicious hate crimes because Respondents are Federal Agencies and the involved public officials are kings and above the law? 2. Did the long list of the Federal Judicial Officers named in the Petition below violate the United States Constitution when they coordinated with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that used Intelligence capabilities so they can cover the exposed scandals and crimes, steal my Constitutional Relief that I am entitled for and won in case : 3. Did the United States Federal Government (FG) violate the United States Constitution when they violated my Human and Civil Rights when they were allowed to abuse and torture me to death under the formal awareness of the Federal.Courts and during my legal and Constitutional efforts to get my Constitutional Relief so J can survive and recover from the harm and damages they have caused me for over a decade? 4. Did the Supreme Court Honorable Justices know and approved the intentional and malicious crimes against the United States Constitution committed against me as formally documented and proven in the related cases listed below when they denied both Petitions filed in Supreme Court’s case 19-7708 despite the FG’s conceded on 03/16/2019 and filed a Waiver of Right to Respond instead of answering the Petition? 5. Does the United States Constitution legalize the Obstruction of Justice, Judicial misconduct, Bias, Public Corruption, Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO) violations, Intellectual Properties theft, Tort and Negligence, Bribes, Embezzlements, Nepotism, Fraud, Forgery, Abuse, Torture, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, Radically Extreme and Malicious Hate Crimes, Monopolizing the Federal Positions, Marginalizing the qualified and eligible ; people-of-color and Minorities, and Stealing aggrieved Pro Se litigants and victims Constitutional Reliefs because of their protected classes, statuses, and federally protected activities? } 6. Did the named Judicial Officers in this Petition commit an intentional and systematic Judicial COUP against the United States Constitution when they insisted for years on Obstructing Justice and preventing the formally demanded Jury Trial from occurring because they know the aggrieved Petitioner will 100% win and the involved Federal Officials will be held accountable? | 7. Did the United States Court of Federal Claims Judge David A. Tapp violate_the } United States Constitution when he practiced radical and extreme corruption from the Judicial bench in case }:21-cv-01578-DAT, when he obstructed justice, presented false and malicious opinion and order in BAD FAITH that presented straight lies and direct threats for the aggrieved Petitioner to “terrorize” and stop him from filing an Appeal to the Federal Circuit from his illegal and unconstitutional order that only aims to cover the FG’s and Chief Judge Philip S. Gutierrez Bribe’s scandal and corruption? 8. Did the Order of United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California ~ Riverside Division Judge Mark D. Houle exposed and conceded the fraud committed against the aggrieved Petitioner when he voluntarily stated in his retaliatory order “where the fraud allegations against him were not so-scandalous as to warrant restriction of public access,” which means that the fraud violati