No. 21-6182
Erick Argueta Larios v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: clear-and-convincing-evidence criminal-procedure due-process federal-district-court relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal district court may use relevant conduct not proven by clear and convincing evidence to disproportionately raise a defendant's sentence beyond what would be imposed for the offense of conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a federal district court may use relevant conduct not proven by clear and convincing evidence to disproportionately raise a defendant’s sentence beyond what would be imposed for the offense of conviction. I
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Erick Argueta Larios
Thomas Jon Iovieno — Law Office of Thomas J. Iovieno, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent