No. 21-6182

Erick Argueta Larios v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: clear-and-convincing-evidence criminal-procedure due-process federal-district-court relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Related Cases: 21-6225 (Vide) 21-6268 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal district court may use relevant conduct not proven by clear and convincing evidence to disproportionately raise a defendant's sentence beyond what would be imposed for the offense of conviction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a federal district court may use relevant conduct not proven by clear and convincing evidence to disproportionately raise a defendant’s sentence beyond what would be imposed for the offense of conviction. I

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Erick Argueta Larios
Thomas Jon IovienoLaw Office of Thomas J. Iovieno, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent