No. 21-6186

Faruq Rose v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-court-of-appeals constitutional-rights criminal-procedure fourth-amendment reasonable-expectation-of-privacy search-and-seizure warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the majority opinion of the United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the petitioner had no reasonable expectation of privacy to object to an unlawful, warrantless search, contravenes rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the majority opinion of the United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the petitioner had no reasonable expectation of privacy to object to an unlawful, warrantless search, contravenes rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment? i

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-16
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 16, 2022.
2022-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2022 to March 16, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 14, 2022.
2022-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2022 to February 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-15
Response Requested. (Due January 14, 2022)
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)

Attorneys

Faruq Rose
William David AumanAuman Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent