No. 21-619

Hugo Reyes-Morales v. Maryland

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2021-10-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process immigration-consequences ineffective-assistance padilla-v-kentucky plea-bargaining sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference: 2021-11-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

If "the deportation consequences of a particular plea are unclear or uncertain…a criminal defense attorney need do no more than advise a noncitizen client that pending criminal charges may carry a risk of adverse immigration consequences." Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 369 (2010). When a defense attorney decides to do more, by incorrectly qualifying the risk as "very low" and mis-advising that the plea is "immigration friendly," does this incorrect advice render nugatory the general advisement about the risk of adverse immigration consequences, thereby rendering the defense attorney's assistance ineffective?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

Docket Entries

2021-11-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2021-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Hugo Reyes-Morales
Robert Charles BonsibMarcusBonsib, LLC, Petitioner
Maryland
Daniel John JaworOffice of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent