Did the Kentucky Court of Appeals allow Mr. Fairchild's rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as his rights under Martinez v. Ryan, 556 US. 1 (2012) to be violated when the Kentucky Court of Appeals failed to find that it was error for the trial court to allow the Department of Public Advocacy (hereinafter DPA) to withdraw as counsel on his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (hereinafter 11.42 motion)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Kentucky Court of Appeals allow Mr. Fairchild’s right’s under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as his rights under Martinez v. Ryan, 556 US. 1 (2012) to be violated when the Kentucky Court of Appeals failed to find that it was error for the trial court to allow the Department of Public Advocacy (hereinafter DPA) to withdraw as counsel on his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (hereinafter 11.42 motion)? 1