No. 21-621
Vince Flaherty, et al. v. Holly Hill Investments, LLC
Relisted (2)
Tags: california-law civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judgment-adequacy notice-of-judgment service-of-notice service-of-process state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether California's no-evidence-allowed rule concerning the adequacy of service of notice of judgment is consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether California’s no-evidence-allowed rule concerning the adequacy of service of notice of judgment is consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? ii —
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-04
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Vince Flaherty, et al.
Vince Flaherty — Petitioner