No. 21-6217
Alberto Grajales v. United States
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-vagueness criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process general-verdict harmless-error judicial-review residual-clause sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a general verdict that was obtained in reliance on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(B) may be sustained based on the reviewing court's finding that the jury also relied on a valid basis to convict
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a general verdict that was obtained in reliance on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(B) may be sustained based on the reviewing court’s finding that the jury also relied on a valid basis to convict. i INTERESTED PARTIES Petitioner submits that there are no
Docket Entries
2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Alberto Grajales
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent