No. 21-6218
Matthew Manuel Barnett v. Colorado
IFP
Tags: certiorari civil-rights criminal-law due-process influence-statute private-corporation public-servant state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an employee of a private corporation can be considered a 'public servant' for purposes of a state statute criminalizing attempts to influence a public servant
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED In this case of first impression, Colorado Supreme Court denied certiorari affirmed a conviction upheid by the Court of Appeals stating that an employee of Comcor Inc. a private corporation was a “public servant” in this prosecution for attempting to influence a public servant in violation of Colorado Revised Statues 18-8-306(2016)? | pray to you ladies and gentlemen of the US Supreme Court to grant this Writ of Certiorari..
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2021)