No. 21-6220
Jehoni Kierre Williams v. United States
IFP
Tags: 2255-motion abuse-of-discretion amendment civil-procedure direct-appeal district-court-discretion evidentiary-hearing federal-rules-of-civil-procedure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel notice-of-appeal
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court denying petitioner's request to Amend is in conflict with The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 15?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: Whether the District Court denying petitioner’s request to Amend is in conflict with The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 15? 2) Whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying petitioner's 2255 motion without the benefit of an evidentiary hearing? 3) Whether petitioner was denied his right to Direct Appeal? 4) Whether counsel at sentencing was ineffective for failing to file a Notice of Appeal when petitioner requested him to do so? s
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent