Whether Feritiener's rights were violated

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether Feritiener's rights vader the brand Tory Llavse we ~. ef the Fitch Amendneat. were violated whens. —~G)a@ timely filed monon under Federal Roles of Cerise] Rocedere 7 120)@) asserring that préyedicsal False evidence phat = . consriTetes due process violations under Mapvev,TUhneis, ce 360 US. 264 (1959) was presented. te the grand jury; and a () the motion was denved apply/rg plata €lfer feview. when. phere fad? been np pret de neve review of the recorcl? —. ; ¢( 2). ‘Whether due process. Violations_in the. gcandyry arising , Le From presecutorial miscondvet should becteviewed under mS the harmless. error’ standard articulated in Chapman Mw -.-.. Lalifocnia, 396.u.S. 18 (1969). rather than that sex Forthin ~~ Bank. of Nova Scotia v U.S, 497U:5. 250Lia¢e), which by _ OTS ferms Is |ynired to nen-CenstituTional. Violations 2. (3)_Whether an indictment that does not satisPy the ceuteria _ —. m fostellov. U.$., 35005359 (1956). Cfeates subject matter ——jucisdietion. na Federal. District Court over a. caprta| . cemuinal..case 2 ee bee ee oe