No. 21-6227

Misael Cordero v. Jonathan Gramp, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: circuit-split due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel false-testimony government-misconduct habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a due process violation occurs when the government knowingly uses false testimony even if the defense knows of the false testimony

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Which divided Courts of Appeals are correct: the Eleventh, Fifth and | Second Circuits holding that a due process violation occurs when the government | a knowingly uses false testimony even if the defense knows of the false testimony, _" _ or the Fourth, Seventh and District of Columbia Circuits holding that if the defense . “is aware of the false testimony no due process violation occurs? 4 2. Which divided Courts of Appeals are correct: the Ninth and Third Circuits _ | holding that the actual prejudice Brecht standard does not apply to perjured. testimony in habeas corpus cases, or the First, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits . . holding the opposite? . _, 3. Can defense attorneys allow the government to knowingly use false , ; testimonies to convict their clients without violating their clients’ right to effective . : representation under the Sixth Amendment? | o ; 4. When criminal defense attorneys provide deficient representation during plea negotiations that prevent the plea negotiations to materialize into plea . a, agreements that would have resulted in sentences lower than the ones received . _ after trial, have they violated their clients’ Sixth Ameridment right, and what would : be the remedy? | . 7 | ,

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Misael Cordero
Misael Cordero — Petitioner