Whether the petitioner was wrongfully convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon despite not owning or having access to a firearm

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ ‘4. How could | receive an Guilty Verdict of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon at the time of this supposed incident, I, Billy John Roberson, did not wn or have access:to any irearm. : 2. How could the Presiding Judge over the original trial did not step aside when their was an previous conflict. 3. lam questioning the procedures of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Title 1, Chapter 21 was not followed by the guidelines. 4, How could | be charged with a crime when | was not present in the area or around the victim when this supposely transpired. 5, How could the Lower Courts not render an decision based upon using the Texas Penal Code 22.01 (assault) that key elements was not present during the investigation. 6. How could the Lower Courts not see the under the same code 22.01 ofthe Texas Penal code 22.02 (aggravated assault) was also not present in any element. ; 7. How could they render Punishment, under Title 3 Chapter 42 Under the Penal Code when certain Elements was not Present during the Trial. . 7 8, Under.the Punishment Phase what gives the rights to Strip my. 2nd amendment Rights to bear arms, In the:State of Texas, after | was wrongfully convicted and seeking an remedy : and have not gotten into any legal trouble since. ;