No. 21-6240
Michael Roger Clemons, aka Chinaman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review district-court guidelines-error harmless-error sentencing-error standard-of-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether any procedural sentencing error can be deemed harmless if the district court announces, without further explanation, that it would have imposed the same sentence regardless of any Guidelines error?
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael Clemons
Paul K. Sun Jr. — Ellis & Winters LLP, Petitioner
Paul K. Sun Jr. — Ellis & Winters LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent