Is a Petitioner denied his due process rights when the Ohio Appellate Court applies an unreasonable application of U.S. Supreme Court precedent in regards to petitioner's Constitutional right to be free of illegal search and seizure?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED GROUND ONE . Is a Petitioner denied his due process rights when the Ohio Appellate Court applies an unreasonable application of U.S. Supreme Court precedent in regards to petitioner’s Constitutional right to be free of illegal search and seizure? GROUND TWO Is a Petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights when appellate counsel failes to argue the sufficiency of evidence error but instead argues that the conviction was against the weight of evidence? GROUND THREE . Is a Petitioner’s due process rights as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution violated when the trial court fails to grant his motion for a new trial? . GROUND FOUR Does trial counsel provide ineffective assistance of counsel when he knowingly submits a vital, yet factually incorrect affidavit in support of a motion for a new trial? LIST OF ALL PARTIES Richard Barnhart Jr. (Appellant) v. Warden of North Central Correctional Institution (formerly Neil Turner) (Appellee)