1. Whether the (Court's) failure to specifically find that the prosecution had made a preliminary showing of racial discrimination when denying a criminal defendant's peremptory strike violates Batson/McCollum and Petitioner's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury of Petitioner's choosing?

2. Whether the (Court's) rejection of a criminal defendant's race-neutral explanation as "not a good reason" or "speculation and intution" are contrary to this Court's admonition in Purkett, at 768, violating Batson/McCollum and Petitioner's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury of Petitioner's choosing?

3. Whether the (Court's) determination that the proponent of a peremptory strike should "do more to establish bias" in favor of the objector, improperly shifts the burden to prove the strike is not motivated by racial discrimination is in violation of Purkett, Batson/McCollum and Petitioner's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury of Petitioner's choosing?

Whether the (Court's) failure to specifically find that the prosecution had made a preliminary showing of racial discrimination when denying a criminal defendant's peremptory strike violates Batson/McCollum and Petitioner's right to a fair trial by an impartial jury of Petitioner's choosing?