No. 21-6259

Shelly Margaret Arndt v. Deborah Jo Wofford, Superintendent, Washington Corrections Center for Women

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split constitutional-provisions discretionary-power due-process internet-research judicial-discretion juror-misconduct prejudicial-error remmer statutory-provisions verdict-integrity
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a lower court can rule that a verdict was not affected by juror misconduct when the exact websites and content viewed by the juror are unknown and unclear

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In this case, juror misconduct was proven by the lower court after a juror researched an | element of the crime on the internet (Wikipedia) during deliberations. The exact websites and content viewed some 14 months earlier are unknown and unclear. Therefore, under } Remmer, how can a,lower court rule that the verdict was not affected with this uncertainty in the air? The 4" Circuit in Lawson and the 9" Circuit in Arndt concluded differently with this materially indistinguishable fact of the “unknowns.” Therefore, this novel i circumstance warrants the exercise of this Court’s discretionary power. | | | | | | | 1

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-10
Waiver of right of respondent Deborah Woffard, Super. WA Corr. Ctr. for Women to respond filed.
2021-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2021)

Attorneys

Deborah Woffard, Super. WA Corr. Ctr. for Women
Peter Benjamin GonickAttorney General of Washington, Respondent
Shelly M. Arndt
Shelly Margaret Arndt — Petitioner