Is a non-profit corporation, acting as a governmental body to review criminal convictions involving the re-calculation, re-analysis and/or re-testing of DNA test results (DNA mixtures) obtained under post-conviction DNA testing statute, immune from compliance with the statutory requirements for performing such DNA testing and analysis, and immune from judicial oversight, thus violating the due process the statute is assumed to provide under Osborne?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED IS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, WHO TS ACTING AS A GOVERNMENTAL BODY TO REVIEW CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS INVOLVING THE RE-CALCULATION, RE-ANALYSIS AND/OR RE-TESTING OF DNA TEST RESULTS (DNA MIXTURES) | OSTAINED UNDER POST-CONVICTION DMNA TESTING STATUTE, IMMUNE FROM: 1). COMPLIANGE WITH THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMING SUCH DNA TESTING AND ANALYSIS; IMMUNE FROM: 2). JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT, . THUS, VIOLATING THE DUE PROCESS THE STATUTE IS ASSUMED TO PROVIDE UNDER OSSORNE? (FN) Pw Subsidiary Question DID THE STATE COURT ASUSE ITS DISCRETION AND HOLD PETITIONER TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF REVIEW IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING DNA TESTING, THUS VIOLATING DUE | PROCESS THE STATUTE IS ASSUMED TO PROVIDE ? , UNDER OSS80RNE ? (FN) FN District Attorney's Offices, Third District. v. Osborne, 129 S.Ct. 2308 (2009) Me p