No. 21-6270

Catherine Pileggi v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2021-11-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel postconviction postconviction-relief state-court state-court-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-12-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the due process clause requires a state court to accept unrebutted factual allegations without an evidentiary hearing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the due process clause of the United States Constitution requires a state court adjudicating a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to accept the postconviction movant's unrebutted factual allegations as true in the absence of an evidentiary hearing? I

Docket Entries

2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-23
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2021-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)

Attorneys

Catherine Pileggi
Dane Kristofor ChaseChase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent