No. 21-6276
Terrell B. Sullivan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-split eighth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review kisor-v-wilkie united-states-v-havis united-states-v-winstead
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-12-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Circuit Erred in Holding that Petitioner's Issue on 'Certificate of Appealability' Was Not Debatable Among Jurists of Reason
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . [1] Whether the Eighth Circuit Erred in Holding that Petitioner's Issue on "Certificate of Appealability"” Was Not Debatable Among Jurists of Reason, When in Fact Counsel Was Ineffective for Failing to Raise the Same Textual Issues that Had Been Raised and Won in KISOR v. WILKIE, 139 S.Ct. 2400 (June 26, 2019) Before Petitioner Was Sentenced; Including UNITED STATS v. WINSTEAD, 890 F.3d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 2019) and UNITED STATES v. HAVIS, 927 F.3d 382 (6th Cir. 2019)? /
Docket Entries
2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent