No. 21-6278
Joseph Fenelon Cooper v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: attempted-robbery bank-robbery categorical-approach clean-vehicle crime-of-violence federal-criminal-law rule-of-lenity statutory-interpretation use-of-force
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an attempted bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 falls outside the definition of a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(8)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is whether an attempted bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113, which may be completed even if it is abandoned before anyone knows that it was planned, falls outside the definition of a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(8)(A). 1
Docket Entries
2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-27
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Taylor</i>, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-14
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-12-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 14, 2022.
2021-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Joseph Fenelon Cooper
Leigh Stevens Schrope — Law Firm of Shein and Brandenburg, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent