Whether the Northern District of Indiana erred by denying Bohlinger habeas relief as untimely under section 2254 habeas corpus Rule 4, and by redacting the issuance of a COA under a substantial, debatable constitutional claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Issue I: Whether the Northern District of Indiana erred by denying Bohlinger habeas relief as untimely under section 2254 habeas corpus Rule 4, and by redacting the issuance of a COA under a substantial, debatable constitutional claim. Petitioner answers: Yes Issue II: Whether the U.S. court of appeals for the seventh circuit erred by not meaningfully engaging in the legal analysis of the COA required by section 2253 and by its appellate review of the federal district court’s decision denying habeas relief. Petitioner answers: Yes ,