Whether the district court erred in denying Junkins' motion to suppress evidence

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the district court erred in denying Junkins’ Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence for the evidence discovered in Mr. Junkins’ vehicle after an illegal search conducted on November 20, 2018 and which led to the charges contained in Counts One, Two and Three of the Indictment. 2. Whether the district court erred in denying Junkins’ Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence for the evidence discovered in Mr. Junkins’ vehicle after an illegal search conducted on August 1, 2017 and which led to the charges contained in Counts Four and Five of the Indictment. 3. Whether the district court erred in basing its calculation of the total amount of methamphetamine attributable to Junkins, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, almost solely on the testimony of one particular admitted drug user and addict. ii RULE 14.1(b)(i) STATEMENT There are no parties in addition to those listed in the caption. RULE 14.1(b)(iii) STATEMENT There are no proceedings in any state or federal trial and appellate court that are directly related to the case in this Court.