Harry Barnett v. Kwame Raoul, Attorney General of Illinois, et al.
DueProcess FirstAmendment Jurisdiction
Whether a District Court's striking of a timely-filed Motion to Reconsider violates due process rights
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a District Court’s striking ofa timely-filed Motion to Reconsider, at two days after its filing date, violates the due process rights of a litigant, especially a Pro se individual, simply due to the fact that a notice of motion was not filed immediately after the Motion to Reconsider, and the ; courtroom’s clerk made no time to respond to requests for a clarification of the clear error on the presiding judge’s ILND homepage as to available , dates for the presentment of the Motion, but the : ’ Court did have time to strike the filing of the motion, causing the litigant to lose his right to appeal the underlying issues by which the Court dismissed the suit and effectively denying access to the court? i