No. 21-6318
Michael Aaron Aldridge v. United States
Tags: consecutive-sentences criminal-sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation substantive-reasonableness supervised-release
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court exceeded the statutory maximum sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court exceeded the statutory maximum sentence of 24 months imprisonment when it imposed five separate sentences of imprisonment, ordered to run consecutively for a total aggregate sentence of 70 months, when there was only one term of supervised release pending? 2. Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors? ii PARTIES Michael Aaron Aldridge is the petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent, and was the plaintiff-appellee below. iii
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael Aldridge
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent