No. 21-6319
Eric Martinez v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When federal law compels the use of state law to define and punish crime, and the state allows probation in lieu of a conviction, does federal law also allow it?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented L When federal law compels the use of state law to define and punish crime, and the state allows probation in lieu of a conviction, does federal law also allow it? 1
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-22
Reply of petitioner Eric Martinez filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-12-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 7, 2022.
2021-12-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2022 to February 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-08
Response Requested. (Due January 7, 2022)
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Eric Martinez
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent