Whether the district court abused its discretion and acted unreasonably in denying Mak's motion for compassionate release

Questions Presented Whether the district court abused its direction and acted unreasonably in denying Mak’s motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c), by, inter alia, failing to identify the correct legal rule; making factual findings that were clearly erroneous, illogical, implausible and/or unsupported by the record; failing to address nonfrivolous arguments; and failing to give adequate weight to all the statutory factors. iv Statement of