No. 21-6336
Darrin Lashaon Betts v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 21-usc-841(a)(1)-(b)(1)(a) amendment-782 criminal-procedure fed-r-crim-p-11(c)(1)(c) fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment plea-agreement sentencing-guidelines statutory-law type-c-agreement
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant is eligible for 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(2) relief
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether a defendant is eligible for 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(2) relief : | pursuant Amendment 782 where the district court adopted a Type-C plea agreement | | but did not adhere to the specified agreed sentence nor to the subsequent | sentencing ,uideline range it found, and if so, is the concluded sentencing departed range defendants' new starting point for purposes of Amendment 782 pursuant to Hughes v. Umited States, 138 S. Ct. 1765 (2018)? | | | , | | | . | | | | | | | | | | | | Ce
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Darrin Lashaon Betts
Darrin Lashaon Betts — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent