Whether a new trial based on plain Rehaif v. United States error is required

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Whether a new trial based on plain Rehaif v. United States error is required where the defendant maintained at all times during his pre-Rehaif prosecution that the state court judge’s failure to mark any of multiple relevant boxes on a restraining order form concerning an intimate partner relationship or the potential imperilment of Second Amendment rights, created not just an absence of circumstances to alert him his rights were restricted, but also an affirmative presence of circumstances that would cause an ordinary person to believe his rights were not impacted.