No. 21-635
Larry Fields v. Cincinnati, Ohio Police Department, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure magistrate-judge standing trial-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the magistrate judge intended violation of the federal rules of civil Procedure?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the magistrate judge intended violation of the federal rules of civil Procedure? 2. Whether petitioner constitutional rights where ‘ violated? 3. Whether the defendants had an _ unfair Advantage of the outcome of the trail? 4. Whether Larry was given due process clause of the 14th amendment? |
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-28
Waiver of right of respondents Cincinnati Police Department, City of Cincinnati Citizen Complaint Authority, Cincinnati Police Records, et al. to respond filed.
2021-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Cincinnati Police Department, City of Cincinnati Citizen Complaint Authority, Cincinnati Police Records, et al.