No. 21-6358

Michael A. Young v. Ned Lamont, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-19
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-or-controversy civil-rights emergency-relief jurisdiction mootness standing
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Second Circuit Court erred in finding that the petitioner lacked standing despite a lack of mootness

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | (1) Whether "Second CLRCUET Court “ERRORED Ineckrer Sposte Hak Tt ’ LACKED iw Srction Aespite LACK * moor Ness"! i (QD Whether SECOND CTRCVET Court suosequestly CRP DREN! on “RoLEnGs Seb ort by “PREMATURE Case "DIS MLSs! In “RULE OF EVEL deliberate "BY £ASS" Aoctrin Qe! ul C 3) Lohelnor (conor LTUTION 3 | Case-ECcontroversy *PFQUTREMEN Sarorieds With actA THUR yowich BCLKELY 40 be "REDRESSED. by FACES judicial Aecrsion Wi re “ apreunant i (Y Whether Pati hiner Michael A. ovnasth 6 MOVANT aS AiG." PRIVATEER 15 ENTITLED ‘Po immediate. Ss) . 1 ‘ o~ — ’ { . EMERGENCY" j cio\ TRELTEF a

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-02-23
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-01
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2022-01-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceAppendix

Attorneys

Michael A. Young
Michael A. Young — Petitioner